scalepack << eof
number of zones 8
estimated error 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
error scale factor 1.0
number of iterations 0
output file 'junk.sca'
format scalepack
file 1 'mydata_anom.sca'
eof
rm junk .sca
|
We are licensed to use Scalepack on Sayre or Bayes.
Very very important!
Before you run this script. Check the scalepack log
file that was produced when processing this anomalous
data.
The chi squared values (for symmetry related reflections) given in
the last table of the log file should be close to 1.0 in all resolution
shells. If not, run another cycle of scalepack on the anomalous data set,
adjusting the estimated error estimates until chi squared is between
0.95 and 1.05. The error estimates used in the anomalous data set will
strongly effect the chi squared test when comparing Bijvoet pairs.
Explanation:
There are two types of chi**2 values mentioned in the paragragph
above. (1) there is a chi**2 on symmetry related reflections and
(2) there is a chi**2 on Bijvoet related reflections.
In both types, chi**2 is an indication
of the significance of the differences between
two measurements. The larger the chi**2 is,
the more significant the difference is. A chi**2
value of 1.0 means that the differences are insignificant.
(1) The first chi**2 value compares
symmetry related reflections within a data set. This chi**2 value
should be close to 1.0 because symmetry releated reflection
should agree well with each other. Therefore, the differences
between symmetry related measurements should be insignificant.
(2) The second chi**2 value compares Bijvoet related
reflections within a data set. You want this value
to be greater than 2.0. The larger this value is, the more
significant are the anomalous differences.
What is the value of adjusting the symmetry chi**2 close to 1.0?
With every data set collected, you look at the chi**2 values to
help you adjust the error model.
The error model is adjusted so that Chi**2 is close to 1.0 in all resolution shells.
When chi**2 is close to 1.0, then you have the best error model.
Adjusting the error model applies a scale factor to
the sigma value for each structure factor in the data set
(but it does not change the structure factor value itself).
Suppose you neglect to adjust the chi**2 values to 1.0. Suppose
they are all greater than 1.0, then
all the sigmas for your measurements will be set
much lower than they actually should be, implying that
your measurements are more accurate than they really are.
Conversely, if the chi**2 are all less than 1.0,
all the sigmas for your measurements will be set
much higher than they actually should be, implying that
your measurements are less accurate than they really are.
How does the chi**2 of the symmetry related reflections affect
the chi**2 test on anomalous differences?
As mentioned above, the chi**2 test indicates the significance of the
anomalous differences. The program judges the significance
of the Bijvoet difference subtracting I(hkl)/sigma(hkl)
from I(-h-k-l)/sigma(-h-k-l). You can see that this
difference is very sensitive to sigma. If you neglected to adjust
the chi**2 of symmetry related reflections to 1.0, then your
sigma(hkl) and sigma(-h-k-l) values will be either too high or
too low. If the chi**2 of the symmetry related reflections was
greater than 1, then you risk getting a false positive result on
the anomalous chi**2 test. If the chi**2 of the symmetry
related reflections was less than 1, then you risk getting a
false negative result on the anomalous chi**2 test
|